WASHINGTON (Ning reporter Ren Ming Chao) Hainan's first commercial defamation case recently concluded, young employees ordered to denigrate competitors, their unit was eventually court in compensation for economic loss of 10 million competitors.
2009 年 7 16, Hainan, southern food sales, marketing, customer service director Xu Zhongmou his office will inform the spring of candy in all RT-Mart supermarket shelves because of an internal investigation of the supermarket E. coli exceeded the spring of candy and let the message through the communication to the public in some way out. Zhongmou asked in what way to spread Xu, Xu said that in some large network forum post, and request to her after finishing this report.
afternoon, Zhongmou planning department with the Southern Food Corporation office computer network forum in Hainan a registered spring After Zhongmou with internal telephone were reported to Xu. On 22 July the same year, appeared in the network forum entitled
2010 年 7 24, spring food to Haikou Municipal Public Security Bureau Network Security Supervision Department report to the poster alleged infringement and violation of unfair competition law grounds, urge the investigation of police. Haikou Municipal Public Security Bureau Office of the Commissioner to initiate an investigation. Although the Haikou Municipal Public Security Bureau then to Xu, Zhongmou alleged damage to business reputation, product reputation not be held criminally responsible on the grounds the case, decided to withdraw the case. However, the spring food or to Haikou City Intermediate People's Court Southern food.
court that Zhongmou fabricated false facts, write stories, spring rebellion through the network of E. coli in food production exceeded candy, harm the health of consumers, called on relevant departments to come forward against spring food products, Although there is no direct evidence on behalf of the Department Zhongmou foods for the southern,UGG Boots, but Zhongmou as individuals, and no conflict of interest between the spring food or concerns, the fact that its unwarranted bogus press release on the network, making slander spring food market image and undermine its reputation and business reputation of the goods incidents, does not meet the common sense. And acceptance of the public security organs examined after the incident, the supervisor will pass their own actions, but southern food is still working, and were not any disciplinary action; sales director Xu Zhongmou knowing the contents of the postings of false cases, still thread echo, not in line with common sense. It can be confirmed, Zhongmou post is directed to perform job tasks, the resulting legal consequences borne by the southern food.
Court in that the spring are engaged in food and Southern food processing and marketing of coconut and other specialty products company, Hainan, are the competitors. Southern food processing and sales of food fabrication spring candy E. coli exceeded, causing children stomach ache after eating the hypocrisy of the facts, and through high-profile media sites to be released, the subjective existence of spring food commodities derogatory intentional tort,UGG Sale, the act objectively damage the image of a competitor's business market, therefore, southern food business defamation actions are consistent with the basic characteristics,UGG Sale, constitute unfair competition.
southern food court requires immediate cessation of spread and damage the reputation of spring food commodities business reputation improper remarks of unfair competition, and the period specified in the court on the designated media published apology, and compensation for spring food economy loss of 10 million.
Related articles：
没有评论:
发表评论